HAJI KHAN SHERIN versus SIRAJ
Section 497 Convention e Martyr (10 of 1984), Article 46 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 109 and 34 bail, the grant of further investigation was dismissed on the charge of canceling the role of the ambivalent lad He was certainly 80 years old and was suffering from cardiovascular disease. It was a serious weakness while the co-accused was subjected to ineffective firing due to a single wound on the left side hip 1/2 inch x 1/2 inch but there was no question of itching. The responsibility of the matter certainly needs to be taken seriously, the accused had not recovered from the point designated to show his participation in the commission of the crime, it was alleged that he had filed an FIR Direct accusations were made, which became a dying declaration, if that fact would not establish his participation. As with any other statement, the declaration of death related to crime was heteronormative. The principle of fictitious liability of an accused requires strong evidence. Of course, any controversial evidence certainly needed to be linked to the commission of the crime, just like the principal suspect. There is a liability against it, no strict and speedy ruling can be formulated in this regard, however, the complete absence of contradictory material / evidence, however, is the subject of such accused's section 497, section (2) of the CRPC. And that will be it. Under the circumstances, the right suspect was allowed to bail
top advocates from Talhur lawyer
