MUHAMMAD NADEEM ANWAR versus SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 10 (2), 282, 230 (7) and 234 (6) of the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9 (a) and 10 (a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 403 of the General Rules Act (X of 1897), Complaint before the Company Judge under Section 282, Sections 282, 230 (7) and 234 (6) of the Constitution Pakistan, Section 13 Double Risk Scope, Section 13, Section 282 of 1984 Appellant's offense has been denied by the Accountability Court against the court. Buy fraudulent loan facilities and use the same for your personal gains, buy property at hefty prices and receive a Kickback Appellant's request before a company judge that he has already been held in an accountability court Has been convicted by, shall not be prosecuted for the second time under the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. Such a request should be dismissed by the company judge. The difference in the elements proved in the two cases will not prove to be the same offense. The institution against the appellant in the Accountability Court was under Sections 9 (a) and 10 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, which sought to obtain any benefit from fraud, misuse, dishonest / corrupt practices or knowingly. , For which they could not legally commit crimes. Appellant companies' ordinances relating to violation of legal requirements in relation to books of accounts and non-compliance with legal requirements, maintaining the correct and fair content of the balance sheet and making false statements of such offenses under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 , Was imposed in 1984. The companies were completely different from such offenses under the Ordinance, 1984 and against such appellant.
law websites from Mangowal lawyer
