JUSTICE KHURSHID ANWAR BHINDER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Articles 204, 193 and 177 of Article 204 of the Constitution with contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3 and 4 of contempt of court, sections 3 and 4 of the contempt court 1976, or any other provision of the relevant law Read, two types of judges were released, namely those who were judges of the Supreme Court or High Courts on 3 11 2007 and the second category was those who were notified of the Supreme Court judges or higher. Was. Based on consultation with Abdul Hameed Dogar, J. between 4 11 2007 and 23 3 2009, the courts offered to issue the Chief Justice of Pakistan dispute notice to the judges who expressed their disdain and remorse. ۔ By seeking unconditional apologies and withdrawal of applications filed by them and confirming their remorse through tendering of resignations, they were dismissed on judges who had already retired and were unconditional. Apologized and expressed remorse and remorse, with regard to the judges taking notice, separate cases will be dealt with against those judges who did not file a response and / or He demanded time for the judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, who resigned in the judgment of 31st 2009 (PLD 2009 SC 879). After that, action will not be taken against the judges who resigned, but they did not file a response to the notices, the process will be repeated accordingly. Within two weeks, the judges, who had neither resigned nor filed their responses, were required to enter the answers within the TT. In WO weeks, the adviser was Justice (r) Abdul Hameed
immigration advocates contact from Usta Mohammad lawyer