RANA SHAHID IQBAL versus MST. SAKEENA BIBI
In some of the reasons for the acquisition of property by the courts in relation to the specific performance of the contract to sell the specific performance of the Section 12 contracts, the plaintiff claimed that he had seized the suit shop because he had taken possession of the suit. , 000 and paid only 5 rupees. , 000 were outstanding pending defendants disputed the confiscation of the possession and admitted that out of the total consideration amount of Rs., 000, Rs. Rs. Only Rs. Rs. The source was denied in favor of the plaintiff should the proceedings be executed after full consideration is paid or, if there is any obstacle to such execution, the possession of the property is agreed upon, The claimant failed to disclose the existence of an obstruction in the execution of the sale agreement and he also failed to provide him with possession of the disputed shop. If such conditions were pretty rewarding, which was proved by the defense and support his defense in. The two courts did not take notice of the circumstances in support of the plaintiff and proceeded to accept the testimony of the plaintiff's witnesses despite the serious shortcomings and despite the strong circumstances which were more reliable. Contrary to the statements of the plaintiff's witnesses, both the courts made a substantial error in their proceedings, which resulted in a mistrial in their decisions regarding the merits of the case, whereby the decisions of both the courts were set aside. And the case was filed. The plaintiff was dismissed by the circumstances in which the appeal was allowed. r \ n
top civil advocates from Ghari Dupatta lawyer
