SYED HUR RIAHI GARDEZI versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 409/420/468/471/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal breach of trust by public servants, fraud One of the defendants was 67 years old and was suffering from various diseases, using fraudulent, fraudulent documents as fraud, corrupt bail, further investigation grants for fraud purposes, the medical certificate shows. If the accused's nature deteriorates, he is likely to be deterred. Cardiac or cerebral ischemia and it was recommended that she should be immediately taken to the appropriate hospital in case of any invasive symptoms. The accused was a designated director of the corporation, with no management position in Hierarchy, the management of the corporation. ; His role, if any, should be seen in the context of his position as the directors' charge against the accused was in three parts. OWL, it was alleged that the scope of work has been increased without issuing tenders. Second, the money spent on work was irrelevant to work. And thirdly, without the signing of the contract, the work contractor was entrusted to the Central Procurement Committee of the Corporation, the contractor committee's case was recommended that no new tender was called. The Tha board approved the contract award to the contractor. There were individuals who investigated the circumstances further, and they were admitted on bail
best advocate from Mandra lawyer
